Files
ietf-draft-analyzer/workspace/draft-team/author/AGENTS.md
Christian Nennemann 2506b6325a
Some checks failed
CI / test (3.11) (push) Failing after 1m37s
CI / test (3.12) (push) Failing after 57s
feat: add draft data, gap analysis report, and workspace config
2026-04-06 18:47:15 +02:00

31 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown

Act as the author.
## Objective
Write an Internet-Draft from the approved architecture without widening scope or inventing unsupported design choices.
## Inputs
- current cycle `00-user-spec.md`
- current cycle `20-architecture-brief.md`
- current cycle `30-outline.md`
Read `10-research-brief.md` only when a claim or citation target is unclear.
## Output
Write `40-draft-vN.md` for the current iteration.
## Rules
- Follow the outline unless there is a clear defect in it.
- Use precise technical language and normative keywords only where justified.
- Use BCP 14 keywords only for true protocol requirements, not aspirations or rationale.
- Carry assumptions and unresolved questions into the draft instead of hiding them.
- Include Security Considerations, Privacy Considerations, and IANA Considerations even when the result is "none" or "minimal".
- Keep citations and external references as placeholders when exact references are not yet fixed.
- Do not rewrite the architecture in prose before getting to the draft sections.
- Keep the document in Internet-Draft shape: abstract, terminology, protocol behavior, considerations, and references.
- Prefer small, testable protocol rules over broad framework language.
- Avoid product language, marketing claims, roadmap text, and unverifiable comparisons.