Ready-to-use project templates with team, workflow, domain, and config: - writing-short-story: fiction 5-15k words, custom archetypes, sonnet for prose - backend-feature: standard PDCA, full team, haiku for reviews - security-review: thorough 3-cycle, all reviewers incl. trickster - quick-fix: minimal 1-cycle, creator+maker+guardian only
23 lines
938 B
YAML
23 lines
938 B
YAML
# Config: security-review defaults
|
|
# Higher budget for thorough security analysis. Guardian gets sonnet for deeper
|
|
# vulnerability detection. Other reviewers use haiku to stay within budget.
|
|
|
|
budget:
|
|
max_usd: 15 # 3 cycles with full team needs more budget
|
|
warn_at_pct: 70 # Warn earlier — security reviews should not be cut short
|
|
|
|
models:
|
|
default: haiku # Most analysis is pattern-matching
|
|
explorer: haiku # Attack surface mapping is analytical
|
|
creator: haiku # Checklist creation is structural
|
|
maker: haiku # Fixes are targeted edits
|
|
guardian: sonnet # Primary security gate — needs depth
|
|
sage: haiku # Quality review is checklist-driven
|
|
skeptic: haiku # Design review is analytical
|
|
trickster: haiku # Adversarial testing is creative but bounded
|
|
|
|
variables:
|
|
max_cycles: 3
|
|
target_paths: ""
|
|
threat_model: ""
|