c/quicproquo
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

docs: add mesh protocol comparison (Reticulum, Meshtastic, Briar, Berty)

Browse Source 
Technical comparison showing QuicProChat's differentiation:
- Only mesh protocol with MLS group encryption + PQ-KEM
- Multi-hop routing + LoRa support (like Reticulum)
- End-to-end crypto (relays see opaque ciphertext)

Honest about tradeoffs vs mature alternatives.
This commit is contained in:
Christian Nennemann
2026-03-30 23:29:50 +02:00
parent 01bc2a4273
commit 84ec822823
2 changed files with 330 additions and 0 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

1
docs/src/SUMMARY.md
View File

@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
- [How quicprochat Compares to WhatsApp, Telegram, and Signal](design-rationale/messenger-comparison.md)
- [Comparison with Classical Chat Protocols](design-rationale/protocol-comparison.md)
- [Why This Design, Not Signal/Matrix/...](design-rationale/why-not-signal.md)
- [Mesh Protocol Comparison: Reticulum, Meshtastic, Briar, Berty](design-rationale/mesh-protocol-comparison.md)
---