Add RFC 8126 to normative references

RFC 8126 (IANA Considerations guidelines) was used inline
but missing from the normative references list.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
2026-02-25 13:13:00 +01:00
parent bf0f94ab30
commit 0a38226b32
4 changed files with 597 additions and 586 deletions

View File

@@ -2294,9 +2294,12 @@ parent reference in the ECT store.<a href="#section-4.2.5-1" class="pilcrow">¶<
<span class="break"></span><dl class="dlParallel" id="section-4.2.6-1">
<dt id="section-4.2.6-1.1">ext:</dt>
<dd style="margin-left: 1.5em" id="section-4.2.6-1.2">
<p id="section-4.2.6-1.2.1"><span class="bcp14">OPTIONAL</span>. Object. An extension object for domain-specific
claims not defined by this specification. Implementations
that do not understand extension claims <span class="bcp14">MUST</span> ignore them.<a href="#section-4.2.6-1.2.1" class="pilcrow"></a></p>
<p id="section-4.2.6-1.2.1"><span class="bcp14">OPTIONAL</span>. Object. An extension object for claims beyond the
core registered claims. This specification defines several
extension keys for policy evaluation (<a href="#policy-claims" class="auto internal xref">Section 4.2.3</a>) and
operational metadata; deployments <span class="bcp14">MAY</span> also include
domain-specific keys. Implementations <span class="bcp14">MUST</span> ignore extension
keys they do not recognize.<a href="#section-4.2.6-1.2.1" class="pilcrow"></a></p>
</dd>
<dd class="break"></dd>
</dl>
@@ -4004,7 +4007,7 @@ registered as a SCITT Signed Statement on a Transparency Service.
This enables auditors to verify both the individual execution
steps (via ECT DAG validation) and the end-to-end supply chain
integrity (via SCITT Receipts) using the "wid" as the shared
correlation point. The "ext" claim in ECTs (<a href="#exec-claims" class="auto internal xref">Section 4.2.2</a>)
correlation point. The "ext" claim in ECTs (<a href="#extension-claims" class="auto internal xref">Section 4.2.6</a>)
can carry SCITT-specific metadata such as Transparency Service
identifiers or Receipt references for tighter integration.<a href="#appendix-A.6-1" class="pilcrow"></a></p>
</section>