feat(survey): add IETF landscape survey (kappa, phase0, rerate), gaps update; bump wimse-ect; gitignore run logs

workspace/drafts/landscape-survey/sections/07-conclusion.tex

@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+\section{Conclusion and Future Work}
+\label{sec:conclusion}
+
+We have presented a verified quantitative survey of AI/agent-related IETF
+Internet-Drafts, based on a curated corpus of $524$ documents spanning January
+2024 to May 2026. The corpus exhibits a sharp recent surge---from $3.7$ to
+$38.8$ drafts per month, peaking at $106$ in March 2026---and is dominated by
+individual submissions ($87\%$ not adopted by any working group) with
+substantial semantic redundancy ($32.4\%$ of drafts having a near-duplicate),
+the signature of a young, pre-standardization design space. Crucially, we
+treated the LLM-assisted labels themselves as objects of measurement: a
+two-model re-rating shows that categorical assignment is substantially
+reproducible (Cohen's $\kappa \approx 0.65$), while ordinal quality scores are
+not ($\kappa_w = 0.13$--$0.21$ for the least stable dimensions), so we report
+the category landscape and exclude the quality scores.
+
+Several directions extend this work. \emph{Full-text classification} would
+replace the abstract-only pipeline and test whether categories shift when the
+classifier reads the complete document. \emph{Longitudinal re-runs} on later
+snapshots would turn the single-snapshot picture into a moving record of how the
+surge evolves and whether redundancy consolidates over time. \emph{Cross-SDO
+extension} to ISO, ITU, ETSI, NIST, and W3C---contingent on reconciling their
+heterogeneous metadata---would situate the IETF activity within the broader
+standards landscape. Finally, \emph{tracking working-group adoption} of
+individual drafts would reveal which of the many competing proposals clear the
+bar from individual submission to adopted work, giving an empirical handle on
+how the pre-standardization field resolves.