Add ASCII art figures to all 6 generated Internet-Drafts

Each draft gets 2 illustrative figures:
- ABVP: architecture components + verification workflow
- ATD: example DAG structure + execution state transitions
- HITL: primitive framework overview + approval workflow sequence
- AEM/PPALP: federated learning architecture + aggregation flow
- RARP: cross-domain architecture + two-phase rollback protocol
- APAE: layered architecture + cross-domain provenance tracking

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
2026-03-04 02:20:39 +01:00
parent 404092b938
commit 3c3d7e649f
6 changed files with 236 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@@ -308,6 +308,32 @@ Table of Contents
these primitives to be composed into comprehensive oversight
systems tailored to specific operational requirements.
+-----------------------+
| AI Agent Decision |
| Loop |
+-----------+-----------+
|
v
+-----------+-----------+
| Decision Point |
| Evaluator |
+-----------+-----------+
/ | \
/ | \
v v v
+------+ +------+ +---------+
|Appro-| |Over- | |Explain- |
| val | |ride | |ability |
+--+---+ +--+---+ +----+----+
| | |
v v v
+--+--------+-----+ +-+--------+
| Human Operator | | Audit |
| Interface | | Log |
+------------------+ +---------+
Figure 1: HITL Primitive Framework Overview
At the architectural level, HITL primitives integrate with agent
systems through well-defined decision points where human
intervention may be required. These decision points are identified
@@ -355,6 +381,24 @@ Table of Contents
preserving operational efficiency through selective intervention
points.
Agent HITL Middleware Human Operator
| | |
|--action----->| |
| request |--approval req---->|
| | +context, risk |
| | |
| |<---approve/deny---|
| | +auth token |
|<--result-----| |
| proceed | |
| or halt | |
| | |
| [timeout] | |
|<--fallback---| |
| | |
Figure 2: Approval Workflow Sequence
The core approval request structure MUST include the proposed
action description, associated risk assessment, relevant context
for human evaluation, and expected execution timeline. Each