Add ASCII art figures to all 6 generated Internet-Drafts
Each draft gets 2 illustrative figures: - ABVP: architecture components + verification workflow - ATD: example DAG structure + execution state transitions - HITL: primitive framework overview + approval workflow sequence - AEM/PPALP: federated learning architecture + aggregation flow - RARP: cross-domain architecture + two-phase rollback protocol - APAE: layered architecture + cross-domain provenance tracking Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -310,6 +310,33 @@ Table of Contents
|
||||
execution parameters that govern how the workflow should be
|
||||
processed.
|
||||
|
||||
+-----------+
|
||||
| Task A |
|
||||
| (ingest) |
|
||||
+-----+-----+
|
||||
/ \
|
||||
/ \
|
||||
v v
|
||||
+---------+ +---------+
|
||||
| Task B | | Task C |
|
||||
| (parse) | |(enrich) |
|
||||
+----+----+ +----+----+
|
||||
\ /
|
||||
\ /
|
||||
v v
|
||||
+-----------+
|
||||
| Task D |
|
||||
| (merge) |
|
||||
+-----+-----+
|
||||
|
|
||||
v
|
||||
+-----------+
|
||||
| Task E |
|
||||
| (report) |
|
||||
+-----------+
|
||||
|
||||
Figure 1: Example Agent Task DAG Structure
|
||||
|
||||
Task nodes within the DAG represent atomic units of work that can
|
||||
be executed by autonomous agents. Each task node MUST specify its
|
||||
execution requirements, including required agent capabilities,
|
||||
@@ -386,6 +413,18 @@ Table of Contents
|
||||
alternate execution paths depending on the configured failure
|
||||
handling policies.
|
||||
|
||||
+---------+ deps met +-------+ assign +----------+
|
||||
| Pending |----------->| Ready |--------->|Executing |
|
||||
+---------+ +---+---+ +----+--+--+
|
||||
| | |
|
||||
| skip fail| |ok
|
||||
v v v
|
||||
+--------+ +------+--+---+
|
||||
|Skipped | |Failed|Compl.|
|
||||
+--------+ +------+------+
|
||||
|
||||
Figure 2: Task Node Execution State Transitions
|
||||
|
||||
Integration with existing agent protocols occurs through
|
||||
standardized interfaces that abstract the underlying communication
|
||||
mechanisms. The framework MUST support protocol-agnostic bindings
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user