feat: add draft data, gap analysis report, and workspace config

workspace/draft-team/cycles/dynamic-trust-and-reputation/55-review-synthesis-v1.md

@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+# Review Synthesis
+
+## Blocking findings
+
+- Add an explicit conformance rule that portable trust assertions require authenticated origin and integrity protection; unauthenticated portable assertions must not be treated as conformant input.
+- Tighten stale-data handling so clearly expired assertions are rejected rather than merely "downgraded" at implementer discretion.
+- Define a firmer minimum portable data shape for trust assertions, including explicit model identification.
+
+## Major findings
+
+- Clarify whether trust-event interoperability is core to the document or whether trust events are primarily feeder objects for portable assertions.
+- Strengthen the handling of negative assertions by requiring either evidence reference or explanation code when such assertions are exchanged portably.
+- Clarify revocation versus supersession.
+- Add one compact example of conflicting assertions from different issuers to make receiver processing easier to implement.
+
+## Minor findings
+
+- Tighten abstract wording around scoped issuer opinion.
+- Make a few terminology definitions more RFC-like.
+- Reduce provisional tone in IANA and dependency text.
+
+## Conflicts resolved
+
+- No major reviewer conflict exists. All reviewers support the narrow scope.
+- The only tension is between remaining model-agnostic and becoming implementable. Resolution: keep algorithm choice open, but define a stronger minimum portable assertion envelope and clearer stale-data behavior.