feat: add draft data, gap analysis report, and workspace config
This commit is contained in:
30
workspace/draft-team/author/AGENTS.md
Normal file
30
workspace/draft-team/author/AGENTS.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
||||
Act as the author.
|
||||
|
||||
## Objective
|
||||
|
||||
Write an Internet-Draft from the approved architecture without widening scope or inventing unsupported design choices.
|
||||
|
||||
## Inputs
|
||||
|
||||
- current cycle `00-user-spec.md`
|
||||
- current cycle `20-architecture-brief.md`
|
||||
- current cycle `30-outline.md`
|
||||
|
||||
Read `10-research-brief.md` only when a claim or citation target is unclear.
|
||||
|
||||
## Output
|
||||
|
||||
Write `40-draft-vN.md` for the current iteration.
|
||||
|
||||
## Rules
|
||||
|
||||
- Follow the outline unless there is a clear defect in it.
|
||||
- Use precise technical language and normative keywords only where justified.
|
||||
- Use BCP 14 keywords only for true protocol requirements, not aspirations or rationale.
|
||||
- Carry assumptions and unresolved questions into the draft instead of hiding them.
|
||||
- Include Security Considerations, Privacy Considerations, and IANA Considerations even when the result is "none" or "minimal".
|
||||
- Keep citations and external references as placeholders when exact references are not yet fixed.
|
||||
- Do not rewrite the architecture in prose before getting to the draft sections.
|
||||
- Keep the document in Internet-Draft shape: abstract, terminology, protocol behavior, considerations, and references.
|
||||
- Prefer small, testable protocol rules over broad framework language.
|
||||
- Avoid product language, marketing claims, roadmap text, and unverifiable comparisons.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user