{% extends "base.html" %} {% set active_page = "complexity" %} {% block title %}Complexity — IETF Draft Analyzer{% endblock %} {% block extra_head %}{% endblock %} {% block content %}

Draft Complexity Matrix

Correlating structural complexity (pages, authors, citations, ideas) with quality ratings. Does more complexity mean better drafts?

Avg Pages
{{ data.stats.avg_pages }}
{{ data.stats.pages_coverage_pct }}% have page data
Avg Authors
{{ data.stats.avg_authors }}
Avg Citations
{{ data.stats.avg_citations }}
Drafts Analyzed
{{ data.stats.total_drafts }}
Metrics
{{ data.metrics | length }} x {{ data.dimensions | length }}
complexity x rating

Complexity vs Rating Scatter Plots

How structural complexity metrics relate to rating dimensions. Each dot is a rated draft. Click to navigate.

Correlation Matrix

Pearson correlation between complexity metrics (rows) and rating dimensions (columns). Green = positive, red = negative. Values range from -1 to +1.

{% for dim in data.dimensions %} {% endfor %}
Metric{{ dim | capitalize }}

Top 10 Most Complex Drafts

Ranked by composite complexity (pages + authors + citations + ideas, normalized).

# Draft Pages Authors Cites Score

Top 10 Most Efficient Drafts

High ratings relative to low structural complexity. Efficiency = score / complexity.

# Draft Pages Authors Score Efficiency

Complexity by Category

Average complexity metrics per category. Wider bars = more complex category.

Complexity by Source

{% for s in data.source_complexity %} {% endfor %}
Source Count Avg Pages Avg Authors Avg Citations Avg Score
{{ s.source | upper }} {{ s.count }} {{ s.avg_pages }} {{ s.avg_authors }} {{ s.avg_citations }} {% if s.avg_score >= 3.0 %} {{ s.avg_score }} {% elif s.avg_score >= 2.0 %} {{ s.avg_score }} {% else %} {{ s.avg_score }} {% endif %}
{% endblock %} {% block extra_scripts %} {% endblock %}