{% extends "base.html" %} {% set active_page = "complexity" %} {% block title %}Complexity — IETF Draft Analyzer{% endblock %} {% block extra_head %}{% endblock %} {% block content %}
Correlating structural complexity (pages, authors, citations, ideas) with quality ratings. Does more complexity mean better drafts?
How structural complexity metrics relate to rating dimensions. Each dot is a rated draft. Click to navigate.
Pearson correlation between complexity metrics (rows) and rating dimensions (columns). Green = positive, red = negative. Values range from -1 to +1.
| Metric | {% for dim in data.dimensions %}{{ dim | capitalize }} | {% endfor %}
|---|
Ranked by composite complexity (pages + authors + citations + ideas, normalized).
| # | Draft | Pages | Authors | Cites | Score |
|---|
High ratings relative to low structural complexity. Efficiency = score / complexity.
| # | Draft | Pages | Authors | Score | Efficiency |
|---|
Average complexity metrics per category. Wider bars = more complex category.
| Source | Count | Avg Pages | Avg Authors | Avg Citations | Avg Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| {{ s.source | upper }} | {{ s.count }} | {{ s.avg_pages }} | {{ s.avg_authors }} | {{ s.avg_citations }} | {% if s.avg_score >= 3.0 %} {{ s.avg_score }} {% elif s.avg_score >= 2.0 %} {{ s.avg_score }} {% else %} {{ s.avg_score }} {% endif %} |