feat: ArcheFlow — multi-agent orchestration plugin for Claude Code
Zero-dependency Claude Code plugin using Jungian archetypes as behavioral protocols for multi-agent orchestration. - 7 archetypes (Explorer, Creator, Maker, Guardian, Skeptic, Trickster, Sage) - ArcheHelix: rising PDCA quality spiral with feedback loops - Shadow detection: automatic dysfunction recognition and correction - 3 built-in workflows (fast, standard, thorough) - Autonomous mode: unattended overnight sessions with full visibility - Custom archetypes and workflows via markdown/YAML - SessionStart hook for automatic bootstrap - Examples for feature implementation and security review
This commit is contained in:
44
examples/feature-implementation.md
Normal file
44
examples/feature-implementation.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
|
||||
# Example: Feature Implementation (Standard ArcheHelix)
|
||||
|
||||
## Task
|
||||
"Add rate limiting to the API authentication endpoint"
|
||||
|
||||
## How ArcheFlow Handles It
|
||||
|
||||
### Cycle 1
|
||||
|
||||
**Plan Phase:**
|
||||
1. Explorer researches: finds the auth handler, discovers no existing rate limit middleware, notes the Redis connection already exists, identifies 3 routes that need protection
|
||||
2. Creator proposes: use token bucket algorithm via Redis, add middleware at route level, 100 req/min per IP, return 429 with Retry-After header
|
||||
|
||||
**Do Phase:**
|
||||
3. Maker implements in worktree: writes rate-limit middleware, adds tests (happy path, rate exceeded, Redis down fallback), commits incrementally
|
||||
|
||||
**Check Phase (parallel):**
|
||||
4. Guardian reviews: APPROVED — finds no security issues, notes Redis fallback behavior is safe
|
||||
5. Skeptic challenges: WARNING — "What about distributed deployments with multiple Redis instances?" Suggests adding a note about Redis cluster configuration
|
||||
6. Sage reviews: REJECTED — test for Redis-down scenario doesn't actually simulate Redis failure, it mocks the entire middleware
|
||||
|
||||
**Act:** Rejected (1 critical quality issue). Feed findings back.
|
||||
|
||||
### Cycle 2
|
||||
|
||||
**Plan Phase:**
|
||||
7. Creator revises: update test strategy to use actual Redis disconnect simulation, add Redis cluster note to README
|
||||
|
||||
**Do Phase:**
|
||||
8. Maker implements fixes in new worktree: rewrites Redis-down test to kill the connection, adds documentation
|
||||
|
||||
**Check Phase:**
|
||||
9. Guardian: APPROVED
|
||||
10. Skeptic: APPROVED (cluster concern addressed in docs)
|
||||
11. Sage: APPROVED (tests now simulate real failure)
|
||||
|
||||
**Act:** All approved. Merge.
|
||||
|
||||
## Result
|
||||
- 4 files changed, +180 -5 lines
|
||||
- 8 tests added (including real Redis failure simulation)
|
||||
- Rate limiting active on 3 auth routes
|
||||
- Documentation updated
|
||||
- 2 ArcheHelix cycles, standard workflow
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user