feat: ArcheFlow — multi-agent orchestration plugin for Claude Code
Zero-dependency Claude Code plugin using Jungian archetypes as behavioral protocols for multi-agent orchestration. - 7 archetypes (Explorer, Creator, Maker, Guardian, Skeptic, Trickster, Sage) - ArcheHelix: rising PDCA quality spiral with feedback loops - Shadow detection: automatic dysfunction recognition and correction - 3 built-in workflows (fast, standard, thorough) - Autonomous mode: unattended overnight sessions with full visibility - Custom archetypes and workflows via markdown/YAML - SessionStart hook for automatic bootstrap - Examples for feature implementation and security review
This commit is contained in:
26
examples/custom-workflow.yaml
Normal file
26
examples/custom-workflow.yaml
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
|
||||
# Example: Custom workflow definition
|
||||
# Save as .archeflow/workflows/api-design.yaml in your project
|
||||
|
||||
name: api-design
|
||||
description: "API-first workflow with contract validation and adversarial testing"
|
||||
|
||||
# The ArcheHelix configuration
|
||||
archehelix:
|
||||
plan:
|
||||
archetypes: [explorer, creator]
|
||||
parallel: false # sequential: Explorer feeds Creator
|
||||
do:
|
||||
archetypes: [maker]
|
||||
parallel: false
|
||||
check:
|
||||
archetypes: [guardian, skeptic, trickster]
|
||||
parallel: true # all reviewers run simultaneously
|
||||
act:
|
||||
exit_when: all_approved
|
||||
max_cycles: 2
|
||||
feedback_format: diff # pass only the delta between cycles
|
||||
|
||||
# Optional: final gate runs once after all cycles pass
|
||||
final_gate:
|
||||
archetypes: [sage]
|
||||
description: "Final holistic review before merge"
|
||||
44
examples/feature-implementation.md
Normal file
44
examples/feature-implementation.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
|
||||
# Example: Feature Implementation (Standard ArcheHelix)
|
||||
|
||||
## Task
|
||||
"Add rate limiting to the API authentication endpoint"
|
||||
|
||||
## How ArcheFlow Handles It
|
||||
|
||||
### Cycle 1
|
||||
|
||||
**Plan Phase:**
|
||||
1. Explorer researches: finds the auth handler, discovers no existing rate limit middleware, notes the Redis connection already exists, identifies 3 routes that need protection
|
||||
2. Creator proposes: use token bucket algorithm via Redis, add middleware at route level, 100 req/min per IP, return 429 with Retry-After header
|
||||
|
||||
**Do Phase:**
|
||||
3. Maker implements in worktree: writes rate-limit middleware, adds tests (happy path, rate exceeded, Redis down fallback), commits incrementally
|
||||
|
||||
**Check Phase (parallel):**
|
||||
4. Guardian reviews: APPROVED — finds no security issues, notes Redis fallback behavior is safe
|
||||
5. Skeptic challenges: WARNING — "What about distributed deployments with multiple Redis instances?" Suggests adding a note about Redis cluster configuration
|
||||
6. Sage reviews: REJECTED — test for Redis-down scenario doesn't actually simulate Redis failure, it mocks the entire middleware
|
||||
|
||||
**Act:** Rejected (1 critical quality issue). Feed findings back.
|
||||
|
||||
### Cycle 2
|
||||
|
||||
**Plan Phase:**
|
||||
7. Creator revises: update test strategy to use actual Redis disconnect simulation, add Redis cluster note to README
|
||||
|
||||
**Do Phase:**
|
||||
8. Maker implements fixes in new worktree: rewrites Redis-down test to kill the connection, adds documentation
|
||||
|
||||
**Check Phase:**
|
||||
9. Guardian: APPROVED
|
||||
10. Skeptic: APPROVED (cluster concern addressed in docs)
|
||||
11. Sage: APPROVED (tests now simulate real failure)
|
||||
|
||||
**Act:** All approved. Merge.
|
||||
|
||||
## Result
|
||||
- 4 files changed, +180 -5 lines
|
||||
- 8 tests added (including real Redis failure simulation)
|
||||
- Rate limiting active on 3 auth routes
|
||||
- Documentation updated
|
||||
- 2 ArcheHelix cycles, standard workflow
|
||||
58
examples/security-review.md
Normal file
58
examples/security-review.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
|
||||
# Example: Security Review (Thorough ArcheHelix)
|
||||
|
||||
## Task
|
||||
"Review the new file upload endpoint for security issues"
|
||||
|
||||
## Workflow: thorough (3 cycles max, all reviewers)
|
||||
|
||||
### Cycle 1
|
||||
|
||||
**Plan Phase:**
|
||||
1. Explorer maps the upload flow: multipart parsing → temp storage → virus scan → permanent storage → DB record
|
||||
2. Creator identifies review focus areas: file type validation, path traversal, size limits, content-type sniffing
|
||||
|
||||
**Do Phase:**
|
||||
3. Maker writes security test suite covering all identified vectors
|
||||
|
||||
**Check Phase (all 4 reviewers, parallel):**
|
||||
4. Guardian: REJECTED
|
||||
- CRITICAL: No file extension allowlist — user can upload .php, .sh, .exe
|
||||
- CRITICAL: Temp directory uses predictable naming (race condition for symlink attack)
|
||||
- WARNING: Missing Content-Disposition header on download (XSS via HTML files)
|
||||
5. Skeptic: REJECTED
|
||||
- CRITICAL: "What if the virus scanner is down?" — no circuit breaker, uploads just pass through
|
||||
6. Sage: APPROVED with warnings
|
||||
- WARNING: Upload handler is 200 lines — should be split into validation, storage, and recording
|
||||
7. Trickster: REJECTED
|
||||
- CRITICAL: Uploaded a 0-byte file with `.jpg` extension → 500 error (null pointer in image processor)
|
||||
- CRITICAL: Uploaded file named `../../etc/passwd` → path traversal confirmed
|
||||
|
||||
**Act:** 4 CRITICAL findings. Cycle again.
|
||||
|
||||
### Cycle 2
|
||||
|
||||
After Creator revises and Maker fixes all findings...
|
||||
|
||||
4. Guardian: APPROVED — allowlist active, temp dir uses crypto random, Content-Disposition set
|
||||
5. Skeptic: APPROVED — circuit breaker added, uploads rejected when scanner is down
|
||||
6. Sage: APPROVED — handler refactored into 3 modules
|
||||
7. Trickster: REJECTED
|
||||
- WARNING: Unicode filename normalization issue — `file\u202e.jpg` displays as `gpj.elif` in some UIs
|
||||
|
||||
**Act:** No CRITICAL. One WARNING from Trickster. Cycle once more.
|
||||
|
||||
### Cycle 3
|
||||
|
||||
8. Maker adds Unicode normalization for filenames
|
||||
9. All reviewers: APPROVED
|
||||
|
||||
**Act:** Merge. Upload endpoint is secure.
|
||||
|
||||
## Result
|
||||
- Path traversal fixed
|
||||
- File type allowlist added
|
||||
- Virus scanner circuit breaker added
|
||||
- Zero-byte file handling added
|
||||
- Unicode filename normalization added
|
||||
- 3 ArcheHelix cycles, thorough workflow
|
||||
- 5 CRITICAL findings caught before production
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user