c/claude-archeflow-plugin
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

feat: add Explorer skip heuristic to plan-phase skill

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Christian Nennemann
2026-04-04 08:48:52 +02:00
parent 12575b5a47
commit 3c7d336c93
1 changed files with 16 additions and 0 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

16
skills/plan-phase/SKILL.md
View File

@@ -117,3 +117,19 @@ When the Creator receives structured feedback from a prior cycle, the proposal m
- **Disputed:** Disagrees with the finding. Must provide evidence or reasoning. - **Disputed:** Disagrees with the finding. Must provide evidence or reasoning.
CRITICAL findings cannot be deferred or disputed — they must be fixed or the proposal will be rejected again. CRITICAL findings cannot be deferred or disputed — they must be fixed or the proposal will be rejected again.
## Explorer Skip Conditions
Not every task needs Explorer research. Use this decision table:
| Condition | Skip Explorer? | Reason |
|-----------|---------------|--------|
| Task names specific files (1-2) and change is clear | **Yes** | Context is already known |
| Bug fix with stack trace or error message | **Yes** | Root cause is locatable without research |
| High confidence + small scope (single function/class) | **Yes** | Creator can mini-reflect instead |
| Task contains "investigate", "research", "explore" | **No** | Explicit research request |
| Task affects >3 files or unknown scope | **No** | Need dependency mapping |
| Unfamiliar area of codebase (no recent commits by team) | **No** | Need pattern discovery |
| Security-sensitive change (auth, crypto, input handling) | **No** | Need risk surface mapping |
When Explorer is skipped, Creator MUST include the **Mini-Reflect** section in its proposal to compensate for missing research context.